Member Support Centre 1800 772 679

International Women’s Day 2026

International Women’s Day 2026

International Women’s Day (IWD) takes place on Sunday 8 March 2026.

The theme this year is ‘Balance the Scales’, which calls attention to the urgent need to ensure fair, inclusive and accessible justice for all women.

Why we celebrate IWD

IWD has always been about collective action. The very first IWD was organised to celebrate the victory of women textile workers and quickly became a rallying point for women worldwide fighting for the right to vote. It sparked a global movement, one powered by courage, solidarity and determination.

In Australia, that spirit ignited in the Sydney Domain on 25 March 1928, when women marched for an eight-hour working day, equal pay for equal work, full-pay annual holidays, and a basic wage for the unemployed. Those bold demands echoed across the country, with rallies and marches continuing ever since, shaping the rights upon which many of us rely today.

IWD remains vitally important to unions as it provides a platform to highlight ongoing gender inequality in the workplace, such as the gender pay gap, superannuation disparity and lack of safety and flexibility.

Women in the PSA CPSU NSW

Your union, the PSA CPSU NSW, has been at the forefront of campaigns to secure gender equality in the workplace by fighting for equal pay, equal access to job opportunity, paid parental leave and job security, flexible work hours, family and community service leave, lactation breaks, and, more recently, 20 days’ paid domestic violence leave and improvements to paid parental leave entitlements.

Last year, we celebrated 95 years of our Women’s Council which originally formed as part of campaigns for equal pay and representation for women in the union. You can learn more about the council’s proud history by watching this short film celebrating some of the significant wins for women that came out of this body.

Sydney IWD event

This year, women from various unions and women’s organisations will gather to celebrate IWD with for a twilight rally at Sydney Town Hall on Friday 13 March 2026 at 5:30pm.

PSA CPSU NSW members wanting to join us to march can meet us outside PSA House, 160 Clarence street Sydney at 5:00pm, or come directly to the event and look out for the PSA flags.

You can contact PSA Women’s Industrial Officer Simone Scalmer at [email protected] if you have any questions.

Newcastle IWD event

The Hunter Women’s Collective has planned a weekend of celebration for IWD that we encourage any members in the area to attend:

Working Women’s Festival

When Saturday 7th March
Time 10:00am – 4:00pm
Where Hunter Workers Building, Newcastle West
www.facebook.com/events/1283451223634156

International Women’s Day March

When Sunday 8th March
Time 10:00am
Where Gregson Park, Steel street Hamilton
www.facebook.com/events/2628942894151692

Gidget Foundation opens new CBD centre

Gidget Foundation opens new CBD centre

Help available for city members.

All financial PSA CPSU NSW members and their immediate family have free access to Gidget Foundation’s programs to support expectant and new parents experiencing perinatal depression and anxiety .

In October 2025 Gidget Foundation celebrated the opening of a brand-new Gidget House at Stockland Piccadilly. This is the first Gidget House in the Sydney CBD which will provide opportunities for expectant and new parents who work or live close to the city to get support in a convenient location.

Bookings are open for bulk-billed individual psychological counselling to support those experiencing or at risk of developing perinatal depression and anxiety. Support is also provided to those who have experienced birth trauma or pregnancy-related loss.

Gidget Foundation is continually expanding its services, having recently opened locations in Griffith, Green Hills and Armidale with other locations in development. There are also a wide range of resources and other support that they provide including telehealth services and village group programs.

PSA CPSU NSW Women’s Industrial Officer Simone Scalmer and Organiser Kim Villanti attended the opening of the new centre.

National Parks Vocational Branch Annual General Meeting November 2025

National Parks Vocational Branch Annual General Meeting November 2025

The Annual General Meeting for the PSA’s National Parks Vocational Branch was held on Tuesday 11 November 2025, followed by the quarterly meeting of the National Parks Vocational Branch Executive. The following matters were discussed:

Vacancy on the NPVB Executive

We thank Aimee Poole for her contribution in her role as the admin delegate over the past 12 months. Which leaves a vacancy for an admin representative for National Parks and Wildlife Service, hence the PSA is seeking to fill this important role.

PSA industrial staff report

There are currently 562 PSA members in National Parks and Wildlife Service. The PSA’s industrial team dealt with more than 70 individual matters over the past year – a busy year. Across the sector, job cuts continue to have an impact in regional areas. This creates many social and psychological issues for our members.

Policy sub committee

It was noted at the meeting that the policy sub committee of the department’s Joint Consultative Committee no longer exists, and so new human resource policies are being introduced without consultation with the PSA. Other policies have been cancelled without replacement or notification to staff, though some of these (e.g. the Compassionate transfer policy) are still available on various intranets or CS Connect. It is a confusing muddle for members and there is a risk that some policies do not correctly represent your entitlements. At the upcoming NSW Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water Joint Consultative Committee, the PSA will be requesting a full audit of all human resource policies currently on these platforms and the re-initiation of formal consultation with unions on all HR policies.

My Work Zone (MWZ)

There remain a significant number of issues yet to be resolved with MWZ. These are far too many to name here but adverse impacts on productivity and staff mental health due to frustration cannot be ignored. It is concerning that duplicate systems to replace the somewhat dysfunctional financial and rostering systems are being adopted. Work-arounds are often not fit-for-purpose or add significantly to the administrative burden of all involved, particularly those who supervise 5/7 workers.

Members with more than one role did not have the appropriate amount of tax withheld from their take-home pay since MyWorkZone was introduced in October. This problem was not acknowledged until some members – many in low-paid clerical roles – complained to the PSA about receiving large bills from the ATO. The PSA is disappointed that NSW Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water is not pushing for a re-programming in MWZ so that it, like MySAP and Aurion, focuses on an individual rather than just roles. We understand no apology is yet forthcoming to the affected staff members. This is not good enough. While the work-around (of informing payroll to remove the tax-free threshold from one of the roles) works for some, it does not work for all casuals.

Law enforcement 

The PSA is concerned at the uncertainty regarding next year’s training calendar for authorised officers and the delay in finalising the revised National Parks and Wildlife Service Compliance Strategy. These issues are due to the unknown implications of the Conservation and Heritage Regulator’s creation in Conservation Programs, Heritage and Regulation Wildlife Licensing Unit is leaving National Parks and Wildlife Service; it and the Specialist Investigation Unit are going to Conservation Programs, Heritage and Regulation. And there is no clear advice on who will carry out the associated compliance and premises inspections, and what law enforcement training will be offered to rangers and other staff.

Women’s issues

The meeting heard a report back on the PSA Women’s conference. Key points included mental health issues and suicide prevention policy enacted by the NSW Government. The large and increasing computer-based work-load and widespread use of MS Teams contribute to mental health issues, prompting calls for better training for staff to help them cope with this significant change in the workplace.

There is a continuation of complaints regarding the agency’s implementation of policies for domestic and family violence leave and parental (maternity) leave. The PSA is pursuing improvements in the handling in these areas.

Work Health and Safety

Some new telecommunications systems to improve staff safety are available but are yet to be introduced in National Parks and Wildlife Service. These include new direct-to-device satellite technology that provides text services in areas remote from mobile phone towers using a standard smartphone. The delay in making this essential improvement to member safety will be raised at the next Joint Consultative Committee meeting in December.

Your delegate team

Andy Leach Parramatta and park programs members

Anita Zubovic West Branch and Greater Sydney Branch

Annie Thompson Aboriginal staff representative

Ben Owers South Coast

Campbell Young all non-field staff in Southern Ranges Branch

Jacq Reid Hunter Central Coast Branch

Janet Cavanaugh North Coast Branch

Jules Bald Northern Inland Branch

Naomi Goosen Blue Mountains Branch and women members

Pete Mylan Field staff, Perisher/Waste point/ Snowy

Steve Carter Field staff, Blowering, Tumut and Yarrangobilly

PSA Staff

Michael Sinclair Industrial Officer

Ivan Coates A/g Industrial Officer

Kim de Govrik Organiser

 

 

2026 Kris Cruden Scholarship

2026 Kris Cruden Scholarship

Applications are now open for the 2026 Kris Cruden Scholarship.

The PSA CPSU NSW established the Kris Cruden Scholarship in recognition of the legacy of Kris Cruden, who was an Industrial Manager at the PSA and a mentor to many in the union movement.  Kris achieved so much in her career as a trade unionist, in the Labor Party and as Mayor of Leichhardt, after completing her tertiary studies as a mature aged student who continued employment as she completed university.

The Scholarship is for women aged 35 years and over who have been in the workforce and are commencing tertiary study.

The Scholarship is restricted to women members of the PSA CPSU NSW who, at the time of application, have been continuous financial members for the previous five years.

The Scholarship has a value of $2000 per annum and will be awarded initially for one year and, subject to a satisfactory report on progress and conduct, awarded each year for a maximum of three years.

The Scholarship will be awarded to a female member selected by the Executive based on factors including, socio-economic circumstances, academic potential, personal motivation, commitment to union values and commitment to studies.

Applications close on Friday, 27 February 2026.

Applications close at 5:00pm on Friday, 27 February 2026. You can download an application form HERE.

If you have any queries, please contact the PSA CPSU NSW Secretariat via email on [email protected] or please call (02) 9220 0970.

National Parks Vocational Branch August meeting update

National Parks Vocational Branch August meeting update

Delegates on the National Parks Vocational Branch (NPVB) Executive held their quarterly meeting on Tuesday 12 August and discussed the following matters.

Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water regulatory review

Delegates raised concerns that the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) regulatory review had been completed without any liaison with the National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) Law Enforcement and Compliance Working Group. It comes as no surprise, therefore, that the review ignores NPWS’s law enforcement role, the seriousness of wildlife crime and the essential training and investigation support provided to NPWS by the Specialist Investigations Section. There was disappointment that the work carried out to date on improving NPWS’s approach to wildlife licensing and compliance may be wasted.

The Public Service Association (PSA) has used the outcomes of the survey across both Conservation Programs, Heritage and Regulation (CPHR) and NPWS to advise DCCEEW of the issues that must be considered in further detail before the change management plan is prepared.

Law enforcement 

The PSA continues to raise concerns regarding inadequate support for law-enforcement efforts in NPWS parks. We are aware that DCCEEW Legal has required Park Operations branches to pay for external legal counsel due to the Department lacking the technical expertise to prosecute matters in court. There have also been complaints that DCCEEW Legal also has few staff with a working knowledge of the National Parks and Wildlife Act and Regulation.

Ranger progression

Delegates were pleased to hear that, as of 6 August, all backpay issues have been sorted with a couple of good wins (such as an extra 5 months of backpay due to wrong processing of the progression application). It seems most responses to the six-month review have been positive. Current improvements under consideration include additional materials to be sent to Team Leader Rangers to assist them in interpreting attainment of the appropriate level in some criteria.

Domestic and Family Violence leave and support

PSA Women’s Officer Simone Scalmer joined the meeting and spoke on Domestic and Family Violence (DVF) leave and support. The PSA was the first union in Australia to secure DFV leave but there are still issues across all departments in how it is managed. The PSA is tackling those collective issues, many of which arise due to poor handling of applications for DFV leave or workplace adjustments by management and HR specialists. These issues, in turn, cause secondary harm to people experiencing DFV.

PSA has created a Fact Sheet on this issue.

Aboriginal issues

Delegates identified that NPWS needs a better system to spread the responsibility and workload associated with cultural heritage management and protection, so that the additional responsibility and workload (known as cultural load) are less overwhelming for Aboriginal staff. When it comes to protection of cultural sites, this should be identified as a workplace responsibility for all NPWS staff. Accordingly, the PSA will be advocating that all role descriptions should clearly identify the additional responsibility to care for and maintain cultural sites, and require Aboriginal Cultural Heritage sites training be made compulsory.

Your Delegate team

Aimee Poole Greater Sydney Branch and admin members
Andy Leach Parramatta and park programs members
Anita Zubovic West Branch
Annie Thompson Aboriginal staff representative
Ben Owers South Coast
Campbell Young All non-field staff in Southern Ranges Branch
Jacq Reid Hunter Central Coast Branch
Janet Cavanaugh North Coast Branch
Jules Bald Northern Inland Branch
Naomi Goosen Blue Mountains Branch and women members
Pete Mylan Field staff, Perisher/Waste point/Snowy
Steve Carter Field staff, Blowering, Tumut and Yarrangobilly

PSA staff

Kim de Govrik Organiser
Michael Sinclair Industrial Officer

95 years strong

Women’s Conference celebrates nearly a century of fighting for equality.

The 2015 Women’s Conference celebrated Women’s Council’s 95th birthday, looking back at famous victories and planning for future wins.

During an upbeat Welcome to Country, Binowee Bayles of the Metropolitan Local Aboriginal Land Council gave attendees an impromptu language lesson and talked about the role strong women played in Aboriginal culture.

Her welcome was followed by messages from Women’s Council Chair Leanne Smith and General Secretary Stewart Little on the role Women’s Council has played in combatting inequality in the workforce.

“Our work gets results,” said Mr Little. “Our workplaces are starkly different to when the PSA was formed in 1899.”

He cited the end of the marriage bar, pay inequality and “jobs for the boys”, as well as landmark pay equity cases in libraries and schools.

PSA CPSU NSW President Nicole Jess talked about history of walking together and the importance of voices being heard. She thanked women who came before her, such as former President Sue Walsh, who attended the event.

Vice President Shelley Odewahn introduced a 10-minute documentary on the history Women’s Council. The documentary, which is available to download on the PSA and CPSU NSW websites, gave a brief history of the Council, including its trailblazing win, getting domestic and family violence leave into an Enterprise Agreement before any other union. It also gave details on pay-equity wins and unsuccessful attempts from within the union to get rid of Women’s Council.

The documentary was followed by a panel talking about the history of Women’s Council. Senior Organiser and former Women’s Industrial Officer Anne Kennelly talked about huge strides made in 20th century, going from a world where “women did not work: women got married and women had babies” to today where they make up more than half the public workforce in NSW. She also talked about barriers encountered by Aboriginal women who wanted to work for the public sector for much of the last century.

Ms Kennelly gave detail on how the PSA fought to end the marriage bars and wage inequality embedded into awards, which limited women’s wages to 54 per cent of what men earned for the same work. As Ms Kennelly pointed out, formidable Delegates such as Jean Arnot from the State Library helped usher in equal wages for equal work, regardless of the employee’s gender.

Shabnam Hameed, who had served a brief term as PSA CPSU NSW Women’s Officer talked about how the Australian Family and Domestic Violence Clearing House wanted to use industrial provisions to get change through to workplaces leave provisions, which is what the PSA did when it got such entitlements into an Enterprise Agreement at the University of NSW.

Panellist and State Library Delegate Trish Leen said, “Equal remuneration for equal work did not happen in a vacuum”, but rather needed to result from change-focused organisations such as the Australian Labor Party and the PSA CPSU NSW.

Ms Leen talked about the ground-breaking Librarians case, where “they compared geologists and librarians. Geology was male-dominated and libraries were dominated by women” and awarded a 20 per cent pay increase to Librarians and Archivists.

“Even today: women’s work is demeaned,” she said. “Look at childcare workers.”

Ms Leen said the case should serve as a blueprint for future women looking to address institutional sexism.

“Be tenacious,” she said. “Get hold of something and don’t let go, because it can take years.”

Former tennis professional Jelena Dokic wowed the crowd with her story of surviving abuse at the hand of her infamous father. Despite her on-court achievements, including grand slam semifinals and a top world ranking of number four, Ms Dokic said her proudest achievement was “finding my voice” after years of domestic abuse and racist vitriol when she moved from Serbia to Australia.

After making “a difficult decision to escape home and run for my life”, Ms Dokic still had to hire security to keep her father away during tournaments. However, mental health struggles took a toll and, after a suicide attempt at the age of 22, Ms Dokic retired from the game she “absolutely loved” and had excelled at since first picking up a racquet at the age of six.

“I asked myself, would I ever be able to live a normal life,” she said. “Then, about a year into my retirement, a deal landed on my manager’s desk to write a book.
“I just wanted to tell my story to help someone: I had to talk about all the abuse I went through from my father and my mental health struggles and 13 months later, my first book, Unbreakable came out. She also overcame reticence to speak and poor social skills to embark on her new career as a tennis commentator and public speaker.
“This was the day my life changed. Nothing compared to this, I was finally free.”

Since then, Ms Dokic has released another book about “the light at the end of the tunnel”.

“It’s about the power of community,” she said. “Open conversations lead to change.”

With her new-found voice – a third book is on its way – she compared the self-belief required to compete in sport with everyday life: “to have any chance to get through you have to believe it”.

“Fall down a million times, it doesn’t matter,” she said. “What matters if you get up a million and one times.”

“I’m not a victim,” she said summing up her presentation. “I don’t want people to feel sorry for me and I don’t want people to feel pity for me.

“Shame needs to change sides. Shame shouldn’t go to the victims and survivors. Shame needs to go at the abusers and perpetrators.”

Mihajla Gavin of the University of Technology Sydney Business School discussed workplace responses to domestic and family violence and the importance of ensuring it is not considered “a private issue”. Speaking at a conference organised by the first union to get family and domestic violence into an Enterprise Agreement, Dr Gavin said Australia had a world-leading role in getting similar conditions rolled our globally.

 

 

 

 

 

 

“These laws apply to hundreds of millions of workers worldwide,” she said.

However, Dr Gavin said there was an “implementation gap” and that conditions were not always accessed by people who would be eligible for domestic and family violence leave. Reasons for this included “shame and stigma” and avoidance of “difficult conversations”, with people from some cultural backgrounds particularly reluctant to discuss domestic and family violence. Other reasons included fear of repercussions such as being passed over for promotions.

Dr Gavin urged the members in the room to ensure colleagues in their workplaces were aware of domestic and family violence leave provisions.

The NSW Minister for Families and Community Services and Disability Inclusion, Kate Washington, said 95-year of Women’s Council was “worthy of celebrating”.

The Minister talked about the work she did with the PSA to repair a broken Child Protection system, recounting the conversations, many of which were “very bleak” she had with frontline Child Protection Workers. While the previous government heaped praise on many frontline workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, she said Child Protection Workers, who continues to go to work, were never mentioned.

“It was clear we needed to attract and retain quality workers,” Ms Washington said. “So for the first time in NSW history, Child Protection and our Child Protection workforce became the centrepiece of our state’s budget.”

She acknowledged Mr Little and Assistant General Secretary Troy Wright for the pressure they applied on her “in fighting for our Caseworkers”.

“We are reclaiming the responsibilities of government,” she said. “We are retreating from privatisation and re-opening residential care facilities. I have responsibility for 13,500 children in our state, it is a responsibility that cannot be outsourced.

“We are rebuilding the system from the ground up.”

Citing statistics on the gender gap in superannuation balances – “one in six women retire into poverty” – financial planner Pascale Helya-Moray talked about strategies women can take to better prepare themselves for retirement.

“The government wants us to invest as much as we can in our super,” she said, outlining the tax advantages of topping up super balances with additional payments.

The state’s first Women’s Safety Commissioner, Hannah Tonkin, outlined her work in protecting people from sexual and domestic violence. She said she has worked with entities such as Transport for NSW, the Department of Planning, the 24-hour Economy Minister and the taxi and rideshare industries to “improve women’s safety in public spaces, and online”.

Said public sector workers play a vital role in making NSW safer for women “That work within government is really important,” she said. “But it also acts as a ‘bridge’ between public and private sectors. I’m focused on women’s safety in all spheres of life.”Her work involved putting people who have experienced violence in front of decision makers and “embedding them into the process”.

As well as government, Ms Tonkin said informal networks, such as clubs and sports teams, are often perceived by women as safer places to bring up violence and abuse than official channels such as the Police Force. She said it was therefore important to be “a supportive listener if a friend or colleague opens up to you about a DV situation”.

NSW, she said, was making improvements. It was the first state, for example, to bring in coercive control laws and it was also improving Police responses to domestic and family violence.

Associate Professor of Law at the University of New England, Skye Charry, opened her presentation discussing the sexual harassment and bullying she experienced as a young worker, where there were no contexts to complain.

“We can make safety a critical component from this moment forward,” she said.

Professor Charry interviewed 107 women in regional Australia to get an insight into sexual harassment in rural areas. She found harassment was more prevalent in male-dominated sectors such as mining, and throughout the country, unacceptable conduct was written off as “banter”, even though it was really harmful language designed “to put high-performing women in their place”.

Even with mechanisms in place, she said a minority of workers in Australia are comfortable reporting sexual harassment and instead such behaviour can be so common “it goes unchallenged”. Professor Charry added and often managers give it a low priority: some called it dealing with “hurt feelings” and “thin skin”.

One strategy when faced with such behaviour was to reply; “Sorry, could you repeat that?” She said this was an indirect method that stops “power in its tracks”. Another strategy was to turn the tables on a harasser and ask, “Why did you say that?”

Kellie Jovanovski, Principal Inspector at SafeWork NSW, asked Conference, “What makes a good employer when it comes to managing workplace sexual harassment?”
She went on to outline three qualities: to understand, prevent and respond.

She asked if an employer understands sexual harassment is a WHS issue and does not regard complaints as employee grievances.

Ms Jovanovski said prevention “is what is going to keep you safe”. She said employers need to take active steps to prevent sexual harassment. Does it define harassment?
“How a business responds to the issue of sexual harassment is super important,” she added. “A good employer will get your investigation done quickly: weeks, not months.”
Anastasia Polites of Aware Super talked to women in the conference about the “catastrophic” superannuation gap, while Jennifer Langton of Aged Care Steps discussed a new member benefit for those arranging care of elderly parents.

Ruth Simms, the longest serving Aboriginal Education Officer in the state and a long-time PSA member had been awarded life membership at the conference dinner.
As Aunty Ruth was unable to attend Conference, the award was accepted on her behalf by Joe Cavanagh from the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Education Corporation. Mr Cavanagh talked about the importance of the AEO role and the fact she always “went above and beyond”, working extra unpaid time to help Aboriginal kids learn to read and have guidance.

“It was fitting to end Conference talking about Aunty Ruth Simms,” said PSA CPSU NSW President Nicole Jess after the event. “Her dedication to making NSW a better place embodies the values we find so important.

“Women’s Conference this year gave us a chance to look back at the achievements of our union, of Women’s Council, and of amazing women like Jean Arnot and Aunty Ruth. Our state would be far worse without women of this calibre.”

Register your interest to celebrate 95 years of our Women’s Council at Women’s Conference 2025

Register your interest to celebrate 95 years of our Women’s Council at Women’s Conference 2025

The 2025 PSA CPSU NSW Women’s Conference is being held on Tuesday 9 and Wednesday 10 September at PSA House in Sydney.

The Conference will connect women members from across the state and from all employers.

This year’s theme is 95 Years Strong.

This important event has special significance this year as we celebrate the 95-year history of the PSA CPSU NSW Women’s Council.

Conference is a fantastic opportunity for both new and experienced Delegates to come together to celebrate the achievements of women in the union. We will mark all they have done collectively to build fairer workplaces. We can also reflect on what else we need to fight for to achieve true equality.

Conference will give you the tools and the confidence to speak up and make an active contribution to your workplace and get involved in your union.

This is a very popular event, so spaces are limited and the PSA CPSU NSW may not be able to offer a place to all who wish to attend. Priority will be given to Workplace Delegates.

Please complete the survey here by Thursday 10 July 2025 to register your expression of interest to attend.

If you have questions about this event please email [email protected]

You will receive the outcome of your registration in early August. If successful, you will receive your release letter and details on the speakers and agenda shortly after.

Domestic and Family Violence Fact Sheet

Domestic and Family Violence Fact Sheet

Dealing with Domestic and Family Violence (DFV) is not something anyone should have to go through. The PSA has worked hard to improve the supports available to you at work should you ever need them and has developed a new fact sheet explaining your entitlements HERE.

Your employer, the NSW Government, has affirmed its commitment to help support employees experiencing DFV to continue to participate in the workforce. They acknowledge that the workplace can make a significant difference to employees who experience DFV through different safety and support measures such as DFV leave.

Unfortunately, despite the availability of DFV leave being universal now to public servants, the types of support provided to employees can vary from workplace to workplace and across different agencies.

The PSA frequently assists members on issues arising from misinterpretation of the entitlement to inadequate support when the member returns to work. Examples of this include (but are not limited to):

  • Payroll denying members the penalty and shift allowances that they were entitled to for taking DFV leave on a shift that would have included these rates, resulting in a lengthy process for the member to fight for the remuneration they were entitled to.
  • Misunderstandings around the requirement to provide evidence of the employee experiencing DFV and how this should be provided.
  • Failure from within the agency to properly ensure confidentiality around the member’s personal situation.
  • Members having their leave patterns reviewed when they have accessed DFV leave, a situation they are unable to avoid.
  • Lack of sensitivity and appropriate support when a member may need to request flexibility in the workplace as they adjust to changes in their lives as a result of the experience of DFV.

We are interested in hearing from any members who have accessed DFV leave and have experienced issues around access to this leave and lack of support provided in the workplace.

Please email [email protected] with the subject heading ‘DFV Leave issue’ by and a brief summary of the issues you experienced, which will be kept confidential and may contain as little or as much information as you feel you want to share.

This confidential information will assist us in further lobbying the NSW Government to strengthen the workplace support initiatives that exist alongside DFV leave entitlements and the level of training provided to agencies to ensure they support their employees as much as possible.

 

Taking back control of your workload

Taking back control of your workload

Do you feel like you are stuck in a one-sided relationship? Tired of feeling depleted? Despite commitments to change, Community Services continue to take advantage of the good will of their (historically women heavy) workforce.

This needs to stop!

The Child Protection Workforce continues to report chronic understaffing and staff burnout. While ever individuals take it upon themselves to go above and beyond in the matters they are allocated, nothing changes for the wider workforce and importantly – the children, young people, and families of NSW.

To assist you in setting boundaries and prioritise your workload, to give you tools to say “No” to work you simply do not have the hours to complete – the PSA will be running Workload Planner Lunch & Learn sessions both in CSCs and via MS Teams.

The current Workload Planner (WLP) is easier to use than you might think, and we urge you to put it into action because the fact remains – if it’s not measurable, it’s not manageable. The Workload Planner gives the PSA, and Manager Client Services, Directors and Executive District Director, evidence to clearly demonstrate that there are not enough workers to meet the workload.

All Community Services PSA Members are invited to attend the upcoming Workload Planner Lunch & Learn to demystify using the Workload Planner to take back control of your workload, not just for you, but for the people who rely on you.

Date: Tuesday 15 April 2025

Time: 12pm – 2pm

Location: Liverpool CSC and MS Teams (link below, all Members are welcome to jump on regardless of location or role)

Bring: Your laptops & have the WLP ready!

MS Teams Link

Join the meeting now

Meeting ID: 486 953 467 524

Passcode: Mo7n32Pz

Download and familiarise yourself with the simple PSA approved Excel Workload Planner HERE

Further information on the Workload Planner can be found HERE

If you would like PSA Organisers to run the next Workload Planner Lunch & Learn from your workplace, email Senior Organiser Belinda Tsirekas [email protected]

 

 

PSA submits feedback on workplace presence

PSA submits feedback on workplace presence

The PSA has submitted a compilation of feedback to the “Workplace Presence” policy proposed by Transport for NSW (TfNSW). There were a number of key themes from the feedback received on the specific policy currently being proposed. These are:

  • Discretionary basis of “standard hybrid arrangement” If the standard arrangement meets the definition of “principally” in an approved workplace, there should be no need for approvals for this “standard” arrangement.
  • Accommodation issues An overwhelming amount of feedback was received regarding the lack of space at workplaces across TfNSW, including a lack of bookable desks, as well as acceptable equipment and facilities to ensure staff are working in a suitable, and safe, environment
  • Undertaking Organisational Redesign at the same time as major changes to Workplace Presence Introducing major changes to workplace flexibility and where staff conduct their work, at the same time as considering organisational redesign exacerbates the adverse effect of both of those changes.
  • Impact on women Any policy that reduces workplace flexibility affects workforce participation for women.
  • Impact on regional staff, their communities and their economies A reduction in remote working will inevitably lead to poorer outcome for staff living in the regions, as well as their communities, and their local economies. TfNSW must put in place strategies to protect career opportunities for those that may live too far from a Team Hub.
  • Team Hub locations Members raised multiple issues with Team Hub locations and want more information on how these issues will be addressed.
  • Concerns around compliance There is a lack of clarity as to how the systems will specifically be used to track attendance, and how this will be checked by individual managers each month.
  • Impact on Cost of Living, Efficiency, Work/life balance and wellbeing The increase in commuting to an office, in many cases simply to tick a box that staff have attended an office but have simply interacted with team members remotely anyway as they are dispersed across the state, leads to an invariable increase in cost of living for TfNSW staff. This cost of living increase comes with no tangible benefit to efficiency for TfNSW, and a huge impact on TfNSW staff work/life balance.

The PSA has put to TfNSW a number of questions that will need to be addressed. You can view the compilation of feedback HERE. The initial questions include:

  1. TfNSW removes the need for a manager’s approval for a standard hybrid arrangement and enshrine this as a true standard.
  2. As staff are required under a standard hybrid arrangement to work five days at their hub, and five further days at a TfNSW-approved workplace, the PSA requests a list of all Approved Transport Workplaces across the state so that staff can understand what the changes entail for them and their individual circumstances.
  3. The PSA requests a full audit and risk assessment be undertaken on every approved Transport Workplace’s facilities and equipment, and the results shared, to ensure that adverse effects of this change are mitigated.
  4. TfNSW needs to provide evidence it can accommodate all staff on their preferred days of working in the office. TfNSW should clarify how decisions will be made as to who is approved to work in an approved Transport Workplace on a preferred day, and who will not be approved to work in an approved Transport Workplace.
  5. TfNSW should confirm that organisational redesign will be completed before any changes to workplace flexibility are implemented. The workplace flexibility status quo should remain until organisational redesign is complete.
  6. If there is a lack of suitable workspaces in an approved Transport Workplace that a staff member is attempting to conduct their work from, will that be recorded and taken into account when it comes to compliance?
  7. Will TfNSW be using data collected under the Transport Workplace Surveillance Policy to discipline their staff when it comes to compliance? If so has TfNSW considered the systems in place in each and every approved transport workplace to ensure that this data gives an accurate representation of a staff members attendance?
  8. How many hours do staff need to attend in the office to constitute a day of “attendance”?
  9. Can TfNSW confirm that the requirement to work five set days per month at a Team Hub, and a remaining five days (minimum) per month at either the team hub or an approved Transport Workplace, will meet the requirement to work “principally from an approved Transport Workplace” regardless of the number of work days in a calendar month, or will the “remaining in person days” increase in line with the number of work days in a calendar month?
  10. That TfNSW provide further detail around the plan to review the currently assigned “Team Hubs” for their staff and how they plan to consult further around any changes.
  11. That the consideration for an Individual Hybrid Agreement be amended from 90-minute commute from the nearest approved Transport Workplace to 90-minute commute from your assigned Team Hub
  12. Given TfNSW is an employer of choice, how does TfNSW propose to mitigate the adverse effect on this major change on women?
  13. Considering TfNSW is a state-based employer, not a Sydney-based employer, how does TfNSW plan to mitigate the adverse effect of this change for regional employees?
  14. Can TfNSW confirm that job advertisements and Expressions of Interest will specifically state that roles assigned to a “Metro” hub can be undertaken remotely, and confirm that TfNSW will not advantage Sydney-based staff over regionally based staff purely on their ability to attend an office?
  15. Given TfNSW is forcing their staff to increase their workplace presence, will TfNSW commit to providing Opal cards for all TfNSW staff, in line with promises previously made to their workforce?

Now that the initial feedback stage has been completed, the PSA has requested a meeting with TfNSW to fully explore our members concerns and seek their response.

What’s next?

Whilst the initial feedback stage is complete, discussions will continue over April and May in relation to the issues with the current proposed policy. Specific actions following this stage is dependent on the responses received from TfNSW. Additionally, the PSA is convening an extraordinary meeting of PSA delegates next week to discuss further action on workplace presence, and will keep members up to date with the outcomes from this meeting.

Update for PSA members: Communities and Justice Flexible Work Policy and Procedure

Update for PSA members: Communities and Justice Flexible Work Policy and Procedure

Following the release of the draft Department of Communities and Justice (DCJ) Flexible Work Policy and Procedure in December 2024, the PSA submitted feedback received following engagement from our members right across the Department. Feedback includes:

  • The policy is too open to individual interpretation, with decisions on “where work is to be done” left up to the discretion of an individual manager.
  • The need for the policy to include a definition of what “principally” in the office means as a benchmark for “where work is done”.
  • Without this benchmark for managers, the number of workplace grievances will skyrocket.
  • The discretionary component to flexibility disproportionately affects women. DCJ and Corrective Services NSW (CSNSW) need to explain how they will continue to support the workforce participation of women and gender equality if decisions around flexibility are left solely to individual managers.
  • There needs to be clearer guidance articulated in the policy on when additional arrangements may be approved, such as family responsibilities; significant commute times, regardless of whether employee is regional or metro; and illness or injury.
  • The need for recognition in the policy that people with family responsibilities, significant commute times, regardless of whether employee is regional or metro, and injury or illness can enter into an individual hybrid agreement which allows for more flexibility.
  • Recognition of the effect on regional communities and economies if flexibility is arbitrarily removed.
  • The need for an explicit section stating that things such as leave, including sick, recreational and flex, do not require any “making up” of office time. A sick day on an office day does not require a working from home day to be changed to an office day. Managers should simply manage sick leave and absences in line with policies and Award requirements.
  • Clearer support for more agile arrangements, in particular areas within the Department that should gain an automatic exemption, such as the Remote Service Delivery Team.
  • The need for a list of approved NSW Government offices, workplaces and related work sites and a DCJ- and CSNSW-wide booking system to make it easier for employees to work in the office.
  • The need for DCJ and CSNSW to conduct an audit and risk-assessment process around the current lack of IT infrastructure to support greater office presence, given majority of their meetings are on Teams.
  • The policy should have an effective date and should be future-focused. The policy should allow DCJ and CSNSW to honour arrangements that were approved in writing and are in place.

On Tuesday 24 March 2025, DCJ responded to the feedback received by releasing an updated policy and procedure for consultation.  You can find the proposed updated policy HERE, and the proposed updated procedures HERE.

Some key amendments 

The Department has made some amendments. However, a number of concerns raised with the policy remain unaddressed.  The amendments made include:

  • An update to the definition of principally to state that “in DCJ, ‘Principally’ means that at least 50 per cent of your work time is spent at your approved office, workplace, or related work site/s, over a period of one month. At least some of that time is to be on a Monday or Friday.
  • Only staff who do not meet this requirement are required to seek approval.
  • The following statement has been added to the Scope in both the policy and procedure:

“Remote working is not generally available to frontline staff. This Policy supports the implementation of NSW Premier’s Department Circular 2024-03 NSW Government Sector workplace presence in DCJ and CSNSW and it is not intended to introduce or expand remote working availability.”

The recognition of the need to define what “principally” in the office means to at least 50 per cent of your work time over a period of one month gives some guidance to what is acceptable under the policy.

The recognition that only employees not meeting the requirement of working “principally” from the office at least 50 per cent over a period of a month need to seek approval from their line manager is also, on the face of it, a welcome change.

The PSA believes it needs to be more explicitly stated within the policy that this arrangement is a standard one, which does not need a line manager’s explicit approval. The PSA has concerns that the procedures as stated, which involve a “team” discussion and plan, will be used by managers who may not support flexibility to deny arrangements which the policy states do not need their approval.

The addition of the statement that remote working is generally not available to frontline staff is an unnecessary addition. This may have the affect of removing flexibility for people who currently have it.  The PSA strongly believes in an “if not, why not?” approach, which does not rely on whether someone’s roles is considered “frontline” or not by a particular manager.

Workplace adjustments

It is important to note DCJ has clarified there should be no changes for employees who have workplace adjustments in place, which include the need for working from home. Employees are eligible to ask for adjustments if they are a person with disability or a carer. You can view the DCJ Workplace adjustment Policy HERE. This policy is not changing. However, DCJ needs to ensure that workplace adjustments for things such as disability or caring responsibilities are managed under this policy, and not subject to the Flexible Work Policy and Procedures need for discretionary approval from a manager.

Where to from here?

The PSA has requested a further meeting with DCJ to discuss the Policy and Procedure and the changes that have been outlined above. We will also seek a clear communication plan from DCJ, and information on how they plan to consult with their staff on the above major change.  We will keep members up to date with developments as they occur.

You can provide further feedback to the updated policy and procedures by contacting the PSA. The PSA has set up a dedicated mailbox at [email protected] for providing feedback for anyone across DCJ.

Workplace Presence – PSA gains extension of consultation

Workplace Presence – PSA gains extension of consultation

As detailed in our previous bulletin, the PSA requested the following of Transport for NSW (TfNSW) last week:

  • That consultation around the proposed changes be extended by a further week, to Wednesday 26 March 2025.
  • That TfNSW commit to a further Town Hall style meeting in the consultation period, with the ability for TfNSW staff to have their questions answered by TfNSW leaders.

Yesterday TfNSW responded granting the PSA an extension of time to Wednesday 26 March 2025 to provide feedback from our members. Considering the extensive feedback provided to both the PSA and directly to TfNSW, this extension is welcome.

TfNSW have not however committed to our second request of a further Town Hall meeting with their staff to answer questions directly from them.  This is disappointing considering the major change they are proposing.

Initial themes from feedback provided to PSA

  • The “standard” hybrid agreement still requiring manager approval. If this agreement is a truly standard, it should be the automatic baseline agreement without the need to rely on an individual managers inclination to approve or reject. It should also remain in place regardless of a change in manager.
  • The discretionary component to flexibility disproportionately affects women. TfNSW needs to explain how it will continue to support the workforce participation of women and gender equality if decisions around flexibility are left solely to individual managers.
  • The affect any reduction in flexibility will have on regional staff, their communities and their local economies.
  • Accommodation issues – Grave concerns that TfNSW do not have appropriate accommodation, facilities and equipment for staff to perform their jobs safely. TfNSW must commit to an audit/risk assessment process which focuses on this issue.
  • Undertaking two major changes at the same time. TfNSW’s current plan of implementing two major changes, organisational redesign and changes to work practices, at the same time does nothing to mitigate the adverse effect of both proposals.
  • Questions and concerns about the monitoring of monthly workplace presence requirements.

The above list is not exhaustive and all issues with the policy will be included in our formal feedback to TfNSW.

Extension to provide your feedback to the PSA

PSA members have an extra week to provide any feedback to the PSA about the proposed policy for inclusion in our submission.  You can provide feedback to the PSA by completing our surveys (links below), or emailing us at [email protected]

Workplace Presence Policy Survey

TfNSW Working from Home Survey – Originally distributed in September 2024

The PSA will distribute our full submission to all members next week.

Become a member today

JOIN NOW